Case MaterialCase NavigationMachado Case
Case Materials |
This background document has two sections. In the first section, we provide
some ideas about the psychological and cultural issues that influence
our use of email. In the final section, we provide some basic advice you
might want to keep in mind as you compose your email. Since this case is about a misuse of email, we have been focussing on
problems with email. But it is not all negative news. Email has become
the primary mode of communication between people in many companies. It
has increased the frequency with which older people interact with their
families. It has allowed large scale cultural interchange. Much good has
come from email and its large scale implementation. Email and the culture of electronic discussion Email is asynchronous. That means that I can send you email and you can
read it at a later time. This is one of its advantages: we dont
have to both be there at the same time. It is also one of its disadvantages.
Since you arent there I cannot see your immediate reaction. Thus, email "distances" us from those with whom we interact:
feedback is not immediate, and it does not contain many non-verbal cues
that we use to make communication smoother. This distancing is not bad,
but it can have effects that hurt communication. There are two effects
that work together to make misunderstanding more likely and flaming easier
to do. Winter and Huff (1996) provide
more detail on this analysis. First, we are distanced from those who receive our email because we do
not see them directly, and because we do not see them directly react to
our utterances. This lack of social cues in our communication means we
do not get feedback about the effects of what we say. Second, when we sit in front of a terminal, we can easily become wrapped
up in ourselves and in our own emotions. Psychologists call this "self-focussed
attention." When this occurs, we can become carried away by our own
interpretations and emotions. Put these two things together: lack of social cues and self-focussed
attention, and you have a fine recipe for misunderstanding and "flame
wars". To this psychological level of analysis, we can add a cultural one. Discussion
groups on the Internet form their own rules and sanctions about behavior
(Finholt & Sproull, 1990). They may expect people to be either rowdy
or calmly professional. They will have ways of punishing those who break
the expectations. Thus these groups become small (or very large) social
venues of their own. The difficulty is in learning how to switch from
one venue to the next. Some practical advice We are beginning to see some convergence in the recommended rules for
interaction over electronic media. "Netiquette," simply put,
is network etiquettea set of rules guiding proper behavior online,
encouraging respect and consideration of others utilizing Internet services,
especially email and newsgroup postings. Numerous sources have been created to help provide information about
netiquette. Several different approaches have been made, because the net
presents a tremendous range of possible problems regarding proper behavior.
In her book entitled Netiquette, Virginia Shea (1994) identifies
ten core rules that should be considered when using electronic interaction: |
||||
|